A new career opportunity lead to my recent relocation from coastal South Carolina to the hot, spacious terrain of  South Texas.  This ‘westward trek’  rekindled childhood memories of fishing the local creeks of northeast Oklahoma and southwest Arkansas with my brothers and Dad.

 

The 20+ hour drive to Corpus Christi – in a rental van jammed with scant furnishings but as much fishing gear as it would hold – I had ample time to ponder the bountiful variety of Texas-sized  freshwater oddities awaiting me.   Smallmouth Buffalo were of particular interest, since this is a fish I enjoyed catching during my early adolescence in Arkansas.

 

It is a strange paradox that some of North America’s toughest, largest  fighting fish  are frequently the least popular among many anglers.  American anglers typically count the best freshwater ‘big fish’ to be musky, pike, large catfish, sturgeon, or even the mysterious alligator gar.   One fish species – the North American Buffalo – has largely failed to escape the shadow of obscurity, despite its propensity to exceed 70-plus pounds.

 

The hardy  North American Buffalo species has, for the most part, been cast aside as little more than worthless, bottom-feeding carp.   There are several species of Buffalo, including the Smallmouth, Bigmouth, and the Black Buffalo.

 

Buffalo are a robust species of large-scaled suckerfish with a body structure similar to common carp.   Buffalo and carp have long been confused or categorized together by anglers.  Buffalo, however, are a North American native fish which has simply grown to resemble its non-native twin as a result of convergent evolution.  The two species are not related.

 

There are several fundamental differences between Buffalo and Carp, the key one being that the Buffalo lack barbels (whiskers, to some).  Common carp, while resembling Buffalo, sport definitive barbells.  Additionally, Buffalo are generally a bluish-grey or tea color with large scales and a prominent lateral line.  They never present the bronzy gold or yellow color of a common carp.  Buffalo always have a dark, bluish colored caudal fin unlike common carp which sport the orange colored tails.  Buffalo – smallmouth in particular – have much more dramatic, downturned ‘sucker-like’ mouths than the common carp, and also possess large, dark, saucer-like eyes.

 

The most abundant variation of the buffalo species is probably the smallmouth, which are prevalent in many Midwest rivers and lakes.   They can be bound in the larger tributaries of the Mississippi, as far West as Montana and as far East as West Virginia.  The species can also be found in the Gulf slope drainages from Texas to Alabama and just about everywhere in between.

 

Anglers in pursuit of buffalo should focus on larger pools, or depressions in larger rivers with low but steady current flow.  Buffalo prefer a habitat with abundant aquatic vegetation, or gravel-rock bottom areas where they can easily forage for their primary diet of small crustaceans and larvae.   Buffalo are primarily bottom feeders, hence their primary diet is insect larvae, algae, and detritus which they ‘vacuum’ off the bottom, beneath gravel and out of aquatic weeds.

 

Smallmouth Buffalo can and have grown as large as 100 pounds.  This presents a particular challenge to anglers trying to land this strong, broad-shouldered fish that also happens to have peculiarly delicate, fleshy lips.    Buffalo and Common Carp have similar feeding habits and can be caught on basically the same type of equipment.   A simple internet search yields an abundant variety of dough bait recipes, but landing a Buffalo can be as simple as stringing a night crawler to a small J hook on a Carolina rig and drifting over a riffle.

 

My brother and I recently spent a few days fishing on the Red River, which splits South East Oklahoma and North East Texas.  My primary goal during that trip was to capture a trophy-sized Alligator Gar.  However, the prospect of pursuing Smallmouth Buffalo just made the trip better.   I visited the same stretch of river in 2011 when my brother and I captured my first true specimen-sized alligator gar (6’9,  140lb).   During that trip I had observed numerous Smallmouth Buffalo surfacing and cruising the shallow flats of the shoreline with their bulky backs exposed.  At that time I did not have the materials to capture the fish, but several weeks ago I made it a point to pursue Smallmouth Buffalo.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aside from the Smallmouth Buffalo’s excellent sporting quality, they make exceptionally good bait for alligator gar and are likely a primary food source for the gar exceeding 100 pounds in the Red river.   Our bait of choice for these Buffalo was not elaborate, in fact it was a method I had been introduced to by Kirk Kirkland, the most well established alligator gar guide you will find.  The bait we chose was formulated Creep Pellets which are actually livestock and horse feed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We used brightly- colored rubber bands to secure our hooks to the pellets.  I have always had a hunch that Buffalo likely rely more heavily on their vision and sense of smell than with the use of barbells like common carp.  The Buffalo’s large eyes and nostrils are evidence enough that they possess a keen sense of smell and sight.  I have no scientific evidence backing this notion, but the colored rubber bands seem to work.

 

The challenging aspect of capturing Buffalo on rod and reel is that, while they may exceed 70 pounds, they are very investigative in their bites.  It has been my experience that a Buffalo will more often nuzzle, lip, and gently mouth a presented bait item  as opposed to grabbing and making off with it.   This is why maintaining a set-up of multiple rods requires keen focus and attention; even the slightest vibration of the rod tip could mean that a truly massive fish is interested in the bait.

 

Additionally, fishing for Buffalo is a very relaxing and leisurely activity.  We basically chose a calm eddie pocket along the river’s shore where the current flow calmed, and observed several Buffalo surfacing.  I set up 4 rods and placed each one – Carolina rigged with creep pellets – on bank sticks.     The action was fast, and required  an experienced hand to know the difference between a casual bump of the line and a legitimate bite.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hooking a large Buffalo requires a great deal of finesse.  Though these fish can grow to immense proportions, Smallmouth Buffalo have particularly small, fleshy mouths.  This, in conjunction with their meticulous investigation of a bait, challenges the angler to use very small hooks that are well-concealed within the bait.  Playing in a potential 40-pound fish on a J hook made for panfish requires anglers to pay vigilant attention to their line drag once the fish is hooked.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Smallmouth Buffalo’s fighting style is unmistakable.  They fight with raw power, scarcely change direction, headshake, or break the surface.  They simply choose one direction and charge away, and defy the angler by presenting a steady pressure which places great strain on the line and hook if not carefully compensated for with proper drag pressure.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

During my afore-mentioned Red River Trip we managed to capture several quality fish.  Although they were not the big bruisers exceeding 40 pounds, they were just the right size to use as bait for a massive Alligator Gar!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Having tangled with even the smaller specimens, it is hard to grasp the fact that a fish capable of  growing to nearly 100 pounds, and with such disproportionally powerful shoulders, could fall into such obscurity in the angling society.  Fishing for Buffalo presents anglers with an opportunity to come face to face with one of North America’s true “monster fish”.  There is truly a sense of pride in realizing these fish are NOT a non-native import, but a strictly American based species with undeniable sporting qualities.


“We as fisherman are as unique in our differences individually as the fish we pursue, and yet at the core of each fisherman there is a thirst for adventure, and the thrill of the catch which we all share despite our different philosophies and beliefs…”

-

As a multi-species enthusiast,  I am frequently on the defensive in the continual debate between mainstream anglers and those who choose to pursue nearly ALL fish.    It’s not hard to understand; after all,  anglers are arguably the most superstitious, boastful, misled, stubborn tale-tellers on the planet!     Nearly every fisherman has his or her highly prized ‘spot’,  secret baits, or rituals, not to mention the ‘lucky’ hat, or a special tattered, stained t-shirt, or some other nonsensical item or habit that he or she maintains are critical to the successful catch.   However, the casual explanation of the REASON for these lucky charms or rituals is generally accompanied by colorful tales of memorable angling trophies, which seem to grow each time the tale is repeated.

-

As anglers, we get so absorbed in our own convictions about what is “right” and “what works best” that they become almost ‘legend’ as they are passed down over time to our closest friends and family.   Therefore, when you place two unrelated anglers together, from different angling experiences , the competitive instinct emerges almost immediately, with declarations of what works best, what never works, and who has caught the most amazing specimen of whatever species is being discussed.

-

For ‘multi-species’ anglers, debate is imminent and simply comes with the territory. There is no shortage of fable-like myths,  outdated notions, fabricated ‘facts’  and legend in all areas of fishing.  Convincing any angler that he or she might be wrong is about  as simple as nailing jello to a tree.

-

“Whatcha fishin’ for?”

“Are you SERIOUS?  Why you wanna fish for (fill-in the-blank, rough fishermen)that?”

“Don’t you know those are TRASH FISH?”

-
“Why do you fish for (____),  those are ‘trash fish’”

-

Ah, yes … where to begin to converse with these opening questions?   Those kinds of questions speak volumes about the type of angler by whom you are querying.  Honest curiosity is one thing, but the premise of these “Why-do-you-want-to-fish-for-THOSE-fish” is packed full of pre-conceived notions.   You just know the “helpful advice” you’re about to be pelted with is basically to let you know that the other angler is much smarter than you could POSSIBLY be.

-

Not much reasoning with anglers like this.   In fact, I’ve developed a few “quick talking points” when I’m asked what I’m casting for, something along the line of “Bass”, or “whatever is biting”, just to stop the stream of opinion I’m about to receive.

-

Yes – I am intellectually capable of providing the true and proper answer to those silly questions; however,  there is insufficient time to be direct with someone simply drifting by on a john boat.

-

There is no harder head than the hard-head of an “old fashioned” fisherman who has plenty of advice to give, but little interest in hearing how someone else might do it differently

-

“at the core of all fisherman there is a thirst for adventure, and the thrill of the catch which we all share despite our different philosophies and beliefs”

-

Simply put, you just can’t rationalize with the irrational… leave out the science, leave out the FACTS,  leave out all ecology, history, and state the obvious.  Regardless of how different the angler’s ideas are from yours, one thing is unmistakably true for both of us:  the ‘promised land’ is at hand when we get a sharp tug on the fishing rod and hear the sound of drag screamin – music to our ears!!

-

“Why do you fish for carp?  Carp eat bass eggs, they are non-native trash fish from China!”

-

A simple and honest response to this question could get you HOURS of lost fishing time, and generally nowhere with the angler making such statements.  ”A fish that grows over 4 feet long and excess of 50 pounds?  Why not!”  generally shuts them up real quick.   Avoid the idea of bass egg consumption etc all together… he ain’t changin’ his mind,   but you describe to any fervent angler a fish in excess of four-feet in length and 50+ pounds and that angler’s mind will ‘missile-lock’ on your words… and generally grab his or her attention.. time to move in on those irrational fishing assumptions!

-

Is that a careless way to handle a situation where someone is obviously in dire need of education?  Meh… perhaps.    What is the textbook long answer for these questions?  Well.. I suppose it depends on the species being questioned.    People have the right to question why we do what we do, and I reserve the right to avoid the question.    In all honesty, there is nothing ‘wrong’ with anglers who choose to fish in a predominantly ‘species-specific’ manner.   Why pursuit THOSE fish?   Simple answer, I am bugged by this concept of what is the  ‘Complete Angler’.

-

An angler is someone who pursues fish, and not just a certain type of fish.   ‘Fish’ are creatures that encompass a greater species diversity than any other class of organism with a vertebrate.   It is not a term that acknowledges popular ideas and beliefs of the hapless angler who so often verbalizes them… or restricts certain species from the classification based on these ideas.   Fisherman pursue fish – and thus,  anglers who pursue ALL fish  in my humble opinion are what I would consider a COMPLETE Angler.  Anglers who single-mindedly pursue largemouth bass, for example, are simply bass fishermen.   Considering that there are somewhere in the range of 32,000 fish species, becoming a COMPLETE angler is virtually impossible, but it is an incredibly satisfying quest.

-

Who is the better fisherman?  An illogical question maybe… but if I had to assume based on how I define the term FISHerman… I would ASSUME it is those who choose to pursue fish ‘boundlessly’… not restricting that pursuit with personal belief, superstition, or bias.   As great a biodiversity as the aquatic ecosystem sustains, an anglers method of capture should be expected to reflect that… and oh the diversity.    The ‘fish’ world includes predators, herbivores, and omnivores… I guess you could toss in filter feeders as well.   Interconnected into these categories are different branches of consumers…  You have salt and fresh, open water species, species that stay primarily in rivers, creeks and streams, warm water/cold water, deep water, and shallow water species and more.

-

Understand that there are predators that move in schools operating as units launching highly organized attacks on schools of smaller forage species.   Just the same,  there are those that are entirely self sufficient, solo predators that may feed completely opportunistically or rely more heavily on cover, concealment, and camouflage.

-

Understand that there are species that grow close to 100 pounds which may sustain themselves on creatures that are scarcely visible to the naked eye,  and those that feed entirely on plant matter.

-

I could exclaim endlessly about the different waters, tactics, etc that are required to pursue all these fish.   However, what I intend to present is the fact that an angler who has dedicated himself/herself to successfully matching these variations of habitat, feeding patterns etc  with artificial tactics of deceiving these fish by rod and reel should be able to take a greater amount of pride in what they have succeeded in doing as an angler than those who choose to dedicate all their time focusing on one, or a few species of fish… neglecting to acknowledge the opportunity presented by the full spectrum of species of fish they could otherwise chase.

-

Is being species specific wrong?  Absolutely not… heck,  it has made some people millionaires.   But to question why, with a predetermined notion that it’s wrong regardless of a given answer,   an angler chooses to fish for ‘trash fish’… is just absurd.

 

 

 

 



© 2005-2012 Fishing Headquarters. All Rights Reserved. Website Design by Ragas Media
Boundless Pursuit: A non-species specific approach to angling by David Graham is a proud member of the Fishing Headquarters.com Writers Network.